Chief Justice John Marshall in 1826. Marshall served on the Supreme Court for 34 years. He remains one of the near honored members in Court history. During his tenure (1801–1835), the Court vastly expanded the role of the national government, broadly interpreted the enumerated powers in the Constitution, and express the reach of the Get-go Subpoena to deportment of the national government. (Image via The Drove of the Supreme Court of the United States. Artist: Rembrandt Peale)

John Marshall (1755–1835), the fourth chief justice of the United States, served on the Supreme Court for 34 years. He is the longest serving main justice in Court history. He remains one of the about honored members in Court history. During his tenure (1801–1835), the Courtroom vastly expanded the role of the national government at the expense of states' rights advocates and broadly interpreted the legislative, executive, and judicial powers that the founders had enumerated in the Constitution.

The Courtroom nether Marshall's leadership limited the reach of the Outset Amendment (and other provisions of the Bill of Rights) to actions of the national government. However, by establishing the function of the Courtroom equally a co-equal co-operative of government, Marshall laid the groundwork for this institution to protect Outset Amendment rights in the future, after they were also practical to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Marshall worked extensively in the early American government

Born in Germantown, Virginia, to Thomas and Mary Marshall, John Marshall was one of 15 children. He was largely educated by his male parent at home. He briefly attended a series of police force lectures at the College of William and Mary and passed the Virginia bar in 1780. This brief period of instruction reinforced the cognition he had gained before in life through reading books and interacting with political leaders.

As a soldier in the American Revolution, Marshall worked extensively with George Washington and held the rank of captain when he left the Continental Army in 1781. He served in the Virginia House of Delegates at various times between 1782 and 1796 and was a recorder for the Richmond Metropolis Hustings Court from 1785 to 1788.

He worked with James Madison and other delegates at the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 in support of the new Constitution. Marshall was amid the more prominent members of the Federalist Party who opposed the adoption of the Sedition Act of 1798. He likewise served as a government minister to France (1797–1798), as a fellow member of the U.S. House of Representatives (1799–1800), and as President John Adams's secretary of state (1800–1801).

Chief_Justice_John_Marshall_(cropped).jpg
Master Justice John Marshall projected a sense of power and stature in leading the high court that had been absent until his tenure. He strengthened the Court'south position equally coequal with the legislative and executive branches of authorities and established the Court's power of judicial review in the political system. (Image via Wikimedia Commons, Creative person: Alonzo Chappel, public domain)

Marshall projected a sense of ability over the Court

Adams appointed Marshall as master justice of the The states in 1801 later Oliver Ellsworth resigned and John Jay declined the position. As chief justice, Marshall projected a sense of power and stature in leading the high court that had been absent-minded until and then. He wrote many of the Court's decisions during his tenure as chief justice. He likewise strongly encouraged other justices to refrain from writing separate opinions from the decision of the Court.

Marshall made the Court a coequal branch and established judicial review

Marshall's ingenious legal interpretations had two effects. They strengthened the Courtroom's position as a coequal with the legislative and executive branches of regime, and they established the Court'south power of judicial review in the political organisation.

In a landmark case, Marbury v. Madison (1803), Marshall ruled that acts of Congress can be reviewed and struck down if the Court deems them to be unconstitutional. This power of judicial review allowed Marshall to substantiate the Court'due south power by ruling that department 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was void and violated Article 3 of the Constitution. Without this ability, the provisions inside the First Amendment and elsewhere in the Bill of Rights would not have had nearly the impact they have had in American history.

Marshall reinforced the national goverment'south ability over united states

Marshall's legal skill farther reinforced the national regime'south power over us. The Supreme Court's decision in McCulloch 5. Maryland (1819), upholding the constitutionality of the national banking company, broadly interpreted the "necessary and proper" clause of Article 1, section eight of the Constitution. Marshall believed this clause provided the ground for additional "implied powers" to belong to Congress, and he did not believe that states had the power to frustrate such powers by taxing federal institutions.

When Marshall was primary justice, the First Amendment and other provisions of the Neb of Rights were understood to limit merely the national government. Marshall affirmed this agreement in Barron v. Baltimore (1833), where he argued that the purpose of the Bill of Rights had been to limit the national government rather than u.s.a.. The Fourteenth Subpoena and the doctrine of selective incorporation have extended the vast bulk of the provisions in the Bill of Rights, including all provisions of the First Subpoena, to state and local governments.

391px-John_Marshall,_by_Rembrandt_Peale.jpg

Chief Justice John Marshall reinforced the national goverment's ability over united states of america and introduced the concept of "implied powers" in the Constitution. When Marshall was master justice, the Kickoff Amendment and other provisions of the Bill of Rights were understood to limit only the national government. However, he Fourteenth Subpoena and the doctrine of selective incorporation have extended the vast majority of the provisions in the Beak of Rights, including all provisions of the First Amendment, to state and local governments. (Prototype via Viriginia Museum of Fine Arts, Creative person: Rembrandt Peale, 1834, public domain)

Marshall Courtroom gear up many precedents

The Marshall Court prepare precedents for numerous other issues, while at the aforementioned time maintaining this dual theme of enhancing the Court's position and reinforcing national supremacy. Several cases dealt with the commerce clause in Article i of the Constitution, which vests all powers to regulate commerce in Congress.

For example, the Fletcher v. Peck(1810) decision was a blow against states' rights advocates, while at the aforementioned time it established the precedent for protecting individual property rights and contracts. Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) reaffirmed the Fletcher determination by ruling that the Supreme Court could strike downward land laws, just it focused on those specifically related to states' regulation of corporations. In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court bolstered the commerce clause by prohibiting states from passing any laws that might interfere with the transportation of goods beyond state lines.

One of Marshall'southward virtually notable commentaries comes from Marbury five. Madison (1803): "The government of the Us has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and non of men. It will certainly finish to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right."

This article was originally published in 2009. Daniel Baracskay teaches in the public administration plan at Valdosta State University.

Send Feedback on this article